\section{Recommendations}
\label{sec:recommendations}

\subsection{Short-term actions}
\begin{enumerate}
    \item \textbf{Restore tutorial harness}: revive \texttt{scripts/shell/run\_and\_check\_julia\_gsi.sh} by reintroducing the missing demo script (or retarget it to the current Julia pipeline), so the original tutorial case can be exercised alongside MWRI.
    \item \textbf{Ship NESDIS centre~7/subcentre~3 tables}: harvest the MTIASI definitions (e.g., \texttt{bufrtab.007.003}) and integrate them into \texttt{deps/eccodes\_overrides/bufr/tables/7/3/}; refresh \texttt{checksums.sha256} to eliminate the ``sub-centre~3'' warnings.
    \item \textbf{Document dual-mode workflows}: clarify in the README how to run (a) the tutorial case and (b) the MWRI regional case, including which Fortran comparators to use (\texttt{run\_and\_check\_gsi.sh} vs. \texttt{check\_gsi\_regional\_results.sh}).
\end{enumerate}

\subsection{Medium-term tasks}
\begin{itemize}
    \item Align Julia outputs with the Fortran diagnostic bundle (diag\_*, fit\_*, and timing files) so that parity checks can be automated for both cases.
    \item Extend the new \texttt{--bufr-table} option to accept centre/subcentre directories, enabling on-the-fly overlay regeneration when fresh tables are provided.
    \item Promote the consolidated report (\texttt{reports/mwri\_comparison\_report/}) to the documentation site once the gaps above are closed, ensuring stakeholders can track parity status across both regional scenarios.
\end{itemize}
